Hello Bloggers,
Hard to believe the end of another year is fast approaching. However, the directorship and membership of the BX/Swan Lake Community Association would like to wish everyone "Merry Christmas" and all the best in the upcoming year ahead.
This month a couple that are completely deaf were given a true gift, when their daughter signed the lyrics of her Christmas concert. (She is the young blonde girl in the middle of the picture.) She conveyed the emotion of the lyrics with her facial expressions as well. So the link is below for all to peruse.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQeygYqOn8g
(only 3 minutes and 41 seconds in length.)
Even in the comments the appreciation is shared as one writes:
"They've just showed this video on national Brazilian television, over
150 million people in the country have seen it... Just great !"
Of course the local station had a follow up:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6F303aNXec
"I wanted my whole family to understand me." - Claire Koch
Such a great gift (and no line up waiting required.)
Merry Christmas indeed.
Tuesday, December 24, 2013
Wednesday, December 11, 2013
Further discussion on Amalgamation
Hello Readers,
The following letter is posted for all to read. It is written by one of the directors of the BX/Swan Lake Community Assoc. and is being posted because it wouldn't be as easy to read in the 'comments' section.
---------------------------------------
ANNEXATION
While searching for information on annexation, I came across a post in the Morning Star written by a former Vernon councillor. The post was about a property owner in the Regional District whose property borders the boundary with the City of Vernon and had made application to the city to be annexed into the city so he could get connected to City Sewer services and hence get relief from problems he was having with a septic field.
The former councillor’s post appears to be in support of this resident and at the same time is taking a swipe at the Regional District. He goes on to say “perhaps annexation would relieve some hardship ie, replacement of a failing septic field by a hookup to Vernon’s sanitary sewer”.
Now let us be clear about what would perhaps provide some relief. If the property owner is indeed having some septic field problems, getting hooked up to Vernon’s sewer services may well provide some relief, although it certainly will not be accomplished without considerable cost to the property owner. You will notice that the possible relief would come from being hooked up to the sewer service, and certainly not from the “annexation” into the City. This so-called “relief” as a result annexation would come in the form of a 20 to 30% tax increase to the property owner in all likelihood. Don’t you just love that kind of relief?
The writer goes on to say that the City realizes “Piece meal annexations do create planning issues and that is why Vernon bundles such applications to be submitted annually to the province. To some measure it makes the problem more manageable. These requests are to join Vernon, not leave it”
Now let us be clear about this last point too. The writer may or may not be aware that the City has no mechanism by which a property may be extricated from within the municipality. That would explain why there are no formal requests to leave Vernon . . . . You can’t get your property out of the City’s confines once you are legally part of it. I found this out when a number of unhappy property owners just east of Tekmar on Silver Star Road had been annexed into the city of Vernon kicking and squealing as they were dragged into the city by the annexation process, which was apparently being driven by a Realtor/Developer, which is usually the case. They wanted to appear as a Delegation to Vernon City Council to get their property out of the city and back into the Regional District, and were told “There is no formal process in which Vernon Council can consider your request”. So, all these property owners got for their annexation relief was a 20 to 30% annual increase in taxes, and a quarterly sewer charge even though they were not hooked up to the sewer service. But they could pay several thousand dollars to get hooked up to the service if they wished to. I wonder if they are experiencing this wonderful feeling of relief.
So when someone says Vernon gets few requests to have property removed from that Municipality, you now know why. There is no mechanism by which they are able to present their wish to City Council.
If the writer thinks everyone is happy being inside the City of Vernon, give the residents of former Electoral Area A (The Landing) a choice and watch the exodus.
The writer points with the finger of blame at the Regional District for the continuing plight of the property owner with the sewer problems. I think if we look at the policy of the City of Vernon whereby if you want sewer services, you must join the city, we may find a key to resolution. Why not provide the sewer service at a cost to the property owner, for which they will have to pay anyway, leave the property in the Regional District and everyone should be reasonably happy.
This either/or attitude regarding sewer services seems unfair, punitive and certainly divisive, and the sewer issue seems to be the beginning of the larger problem, that being annexation. Neither of these matters are based on fairness. The City of Vernon has enough land within their boundary for 25 years of development. Why do they need more?
Surely some common ground can be found here. The “policy” is where the blame should be placed.
Ray Ivey
BX resident.
---------------------------------------
As usual, readers are invited to leave their comments/thoughts in the comment section below.
The following letter is posted for all to read. It is written by one of the directors of the BX/Swan Lake Community Assoc. and is being posted because it wouldn't be as easy to read in the 'comments' section.
---------------------------------------
ANNEXATION
While searching for information on annexation, I came across a post in the Morning Star written by a former Vernon councillor. The post was about a property owner in the Regional District whose property borders the boundary with the City of Vernon and had made application to the city to be annexed into the city so he could get connected to City Sewer services and hence get relief from problems he was having with a septic field.
The former councillor’s post appears to be in support of this resident and at the same time is taking a swipe at the Regional District. He goes on to say “perhaps annexation would relieve some hardship ie, replacement of a failing septic field by a hookup to Vernon’s sanitary sewer”.
Now let us be clear about what would perhaps provide some relief. If the property owner is indeed having some septic field problems, getting hooked up to Vernon’s sewer services may well provide some relief, although it certainly will not be accomplished without considerable cost to the property owner. You will notice that the possible relief would come from being hooked up to the sewer service, and certainly not from the “annexation” into the City. This so-called “relief” as a result annexation would come in the form of a 20 to 30% tax increase to the property owner in all likelihood. Don’t you just love that kind of relief?
The writer goes on to say that the City realizes “Piece meal annexations do create planning issues and that is why Vernon bundles such applications to be submitted annually to the province. To some measure it makes the problem more manageable. These requests are to join Vernon, not leave it”
Now let us be clear about this last point too. The writer may or may not be aware that the City has no mechanism by which a property may be extricated from within the municipality. That would explain why there are no formal requests to leave Vernon . . . . You can’t get your property out of the City’s confines once you are legally part of it. I found this out when a number of unhappy property owners just east of Tekmar on Silver Star Road had been annexed into the city of Vernon kicking and squealing as they were dragged into the city by the annexation process, which was apparently being driven by a Realtor/Developer, which is usually the case. They wanted to appear as a Delegation to Vernon City Council to get their property out of the city and back into the Regional District, and were told “There is no formal process in which Vernon Council can consider your request”. So, all these property owners got for their annexation relief was a 20 to 30% annual increase in taxes, and a quarterly sewer charge even though they were not hooked up to the sewer service. But they could pay several thousand dollars to get hooked up to the service if they wished to. I wonder if they are experiencing this wonderful feeling of relief.
So when someone says Vernon gets few requests to have property removed from that Municipality, you now know why. There is no mechanism by which they are able to present their wish to City Council.
If the writer thinks everyone is happy being inside the City of Vernon, give the residents of former Electoral Area A (The Landing) a choice and watch the exodus.
The writer points with the finger of blame at the Regional District for the continuing plight of the property owner with the sewer problems. I think if we look at the policy of the City of Vernon whereby if you want sewer services, you must join the city, we may find a key to resolution. Why not provide the sewer service at a cost to the property owner, for which they will have to pay anyway, leave the property in the Regional District and everyone should be reasonably happy.
This either/or attitude regarding sewer services seems unfair, punitive and certainly divisive, and the sewer issue seems to be the beginning of the larger problem, that being annexation. Neither of these matters are based on fairness. The City of Vernon has enough land within their boundary for 25 years of development. Why do they need more?
Surely some common ground can be found here. The “policy” is where the blame should be placed.
Ray Ivey
BX resident.
---------------------------------------
As usual, readers are invited to leave their comments/thoughts in the comment section below.
Saturday, December 7, 2013
Public Letter Requirement
Greetings Bloggers,
In the post before last there was the petition Re: BX Gravel Pit. Now, more than just a petition signature is required. As the following text states...
--------------------
We had previously told you about our battle against the Gravel pit in our neighbourhood.
We would like to thank everyone who signed our petition!!
To date we have collected more than 1100 signatures on our petition. Now we need your help again please.
The Gravel pit owner, Klayton Mertion has sent a ‘Notice of Work’ application to the Ministry of Energy and Mines (MEM) submission date Nov 11, 2013. Klayton then placed a ‘Notice of Proposed Sand and Gravel’ in the Morning Star Nov 22, 2013 stating that the community had 30 days to get letters of concern to MEM. The notice was published in the Morning Star Nov 22 and 24 2013 in the Classified Section on the 2nd to last page under “Legal Notices”.
The full proposal is available to anyone at the Vernon Library, upstairs from the reference desk. They will make you a photocopy of the entire proposal for your own use. MEM has just confirmed that the deadline date for these letters is Dec 24th.
We are quite concerned that we get enough letters sent. We would appreciate it if you would send a letter to the email address below and also encourage all your friends & neighbours to as well. Each person can put their own spin on it but it is important that they get multiple letters. We are also sending our whole brief to MEM with copies of all 1100 + signatures on the petition.
Please also be aware that there will VERY LIKELY be a community public meeting in the near future, with Klayton and someone from the Ministry of Energy and Mines present. We will let you know the minute we know of the date for this meeting so that all interested will come out to voice their concerns and opposition to this Gravel Pit.
The email address to send your letter is:
mmd-kamloops@gov.bc.ca
Please refer to the Klayton Mertion - MSG Pit application
aka BX Creek Pit of Klayton Mertion, 5801 Brentwood Road, Vernon BC
or a letter by post mail:
Chief Inspector of Mines,
Ministry of Energy and Mines South Central Region,
2nd Floor, 441 Columbia Street,
Kamloops, B.C.
V2C 2T3
Any letters will be effective, they don’t have to be complicated or eloquent, but honest and sincere.
Just be sure to clearly state that you don’t want the Mertion gravel pit in the most inappropriate location, the BX Ravine beside the BX Creek and ask them to deny him a permit.
Appreciatively,
Elaine Vanderwal
5674 Brentwood Rd Vernon BC
250-545-3536
tevanderwal@telus.net
--------------------
So please write and send your own letters containing your concerns, comments and thoughts on this proposed development. Re: Mailing of letters, please do so as soon as possible to avoid any mail delays due to the increased volume near Christmas. The email option is most likely faster but less formal.
The deadline for letters to the Ministry of Energy and Mines is DEC. 24th, 2013.
Any assistance (in letter format) will be greatly appreciated.
----------------------------------------
As noted from our earlier post:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPmElng5uUk&feature=youtu.be
Resident generated video
http://www2.worksafebc.com/i/construction/Toolbox/pdfs/TG07-42_dangers_silica_dust.pdf
http://www2.worksafebc.com/i/posters/pdfs/2009/ws_09_04.pdf
Dangers of crystalline silica produced in the gravel industry.
http:/www.tourismvernon.com/index.php/activities/hiking
Vernon Tourism "Top 10 Hiking Trails" (pit site is near #1.)
In the post before last there was the petition Re: BX Gravel Pit. Now, more than just a petition signature is required. As the following text states...
--------------------
We had previously told you about our battle against the Gravel pit in our neighbourhood.
We would like to thank everyone who signed our petition!!
To date we have collected more than 1100 signatures on our petition. Now we need your help again please.
The Gravel pit owner, Klayton Mertion has sent a ‘Notice of Work’ application to the Ministry of Energy and Mines (MEM) submission date Nov 11, 2013. Klayton then placed a ‘Notice of Proposed Sand and Gravel’ in the Morning Star Nov 22, 2013 stating that the community had 30 days to get letters of concern to MEM. The notice was published in the Morning Star Nov 22 and 24 2013 in the Classified Section on the 2nd to last page under “Legal Notices”.
The full proposal is available to anyone at the Vernon Library, upstairs from the reference desk. They will make you a photocopy of the entire proposal for your own use. MEM has just confirmed that the deadline date for these letters is Dec 24th.
We are quite concerned that we get enough letters sent. We would appreciate it if you would send a letter to the email address below and also encourage all your friends & neighbours to as well. Each person can put their own spin on it but it is important that they get multiple letters. We are also sending our whole brief to MEM with copies of all 1100 + signatures on the petition.
Please also be aware that there will VERY LIKELY be a community public meeting in the near future, with Klayton and someone from the Ministry of Energy and Mines present. We will let you know the minute we know of the date for this meeting so that all interested will come out to voice their concerns and opposition to this Gravel Pit.
The email address to send your letter is:
mmd-kamloops@gov.bc.ca
Please refer to the Klayton Mertion - MSG Pit application
aka BX Creek Pit of Klayton Mertion, 5801 Brentwood Road, Vernon BC
or a letter by post mail:
Chief Inspector of Mines,
Ministry of Energy and Mines South Central Region,
2nd Floor, 441 Columbia Street,
Kamloops, B.C.
V2C 2T3
Any letters will be effective, they don’t have to be complicated or eloquent, but honest and sincere.
Just be sure to clearly state that you don’t want the Mertion gravel pit in the most inappropriate location, the BX Ravine beside the BX Creek and ask them to deny him a permit.
Appreciatively,
Elaine Vanderwal
5674 Brentwood Rd Vernon BC
250-545-3536
tevanderwal@telus.net
--------------------
So please write and send your own letters containing your concerns, comments and thoughts on this proposed development. Re: Mailing of letters, please do so as soon as possible to avoid any mail delays due to the increased volume near Christmas. The email option is most likely faster but less formal.
The deadline for letters to the Ministry of Energy and Mines is DEC. 24th, 2013.
Any assistance (in letter format) will be greatly appreciated.
----------------------------------------
As noted from our earlier post:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPmElng5uUk&feature=youtu.be
Resident generated video
http://www2.worksafebc.com/i/construction/Toolbox/pdfs/TG07-42_dangers_silica_dust.pdf
http://www2.worksafebc.com/i/posters/pdfs/2009/ws_09_04.pdf
Dangers of crystalline silica produced in the gravel industry.
http:/www.tourismvernon.com/index.php/activities/hiking
Vernon Tourism "Top 10 Hiking Trails" (pit site is near #1.)
Sunday, November 24, 2013
November Follow-Up
Hello Everyone,
This post has just a couple of entries that are as follows:
Firstly, the assoc. has written and submitted a letter to the Morning Star paper. Specifically, the editorial letter column. As we are anxiously anticipating it's publication, here it is on the 'down low'.
-----------------------
Re: Unification
Recently, a lot of media focus has been on a petition to amalgamate the District of Coldstream, Regional District Areas "B" & "C" with the City of Vernon, or to create a new municipality, under the guise of streamlining regulations when dealing with more than one of the above jurisdictions. The Society for the Future Governance of Greater Vernon is the body that is forwarding the results of this petition to local and provincial authorities for their consideration to undertake a study to examine these possibilities.
While the dream may be entertaining, in reality, it would be a nightmare. For the most part, people live in different jurisdictions by choice. People who feel more comfortable by what a city may afford them live in the city. Likewise, people who prefer a rural lifestyle live in the country. There is no recognizable gain for residents of Electoral Areas to amalgamate with the City of Vernon or any newly formed facsimile. Taxes would certainly increase and services provided would probably not change very much, if any. There is far too much history about both small and large annexations, by the City of Vernon, in the recent past to come to any other conclusion. Also, if there are policies within these four jurisdictions that are truly hampering investment in this area, they can probably be streamlined, without the need to re-invent the municipal wheel.
Mr. Peter Moore stated in one article in the Morning Star, "It would be wise for them to ask to have the question on the ballot so they can vote no once and for all." Well, I would like to point out that the residents of the Regional District Areas have said no before, regarding annexation, when it was put to a referendum back in 2008. As published in the Morning Star article that year "Area B (BX/Swan Lake) reported 76% of respondents were opposed to a change in governance while 24% were in favor. Area C (BX/Silver Star) the question resulted in 74% being against any change while 26% were if favor. For Area D (rural Lumby) 85% wanted to keep the current system while 15% want a change. Area E (Cherryville) residents were the loudest in their support for status quo - 95% - while only 5% wanted change." I understand that Areas D and E are not being sought in this unification petition question. However, the percentages reported are worth mentioning while on the governance topic.
The petition is estimating approximately 4000 signatures to be considered a success. The City of Vernon has a population of 38,150, while its metropolitan region, Greater Vernon, has a population of 58,584 as cited from the Canada 2011 Census. So if the 4000 residents come from all areas as claimed, then it is only 6.8% of the population desiring this change in governance. Hardly a majority and less than 1 in 10. As reported on Monday, November 4th 2013 by "107.5 KISS FM" radio station "they had 1,637 online supporters, with an estimated 1000 written at last count." This actually comes to only 4.6% of the Greater Vernon population.
In conclusion, Re: Unification. All residents should exercise a measured, pragmatic approach rather than an emotionally reactive response. And if the Society for the Future Governance of Greater Vernon desires for more direct input, then possibly they should consider a run for Mayor and/or Council of the respective jurisdictions.
Chris Edwards
President, B.X./Swan Lake Community Association
-----------------------
One detail that isn't in the letter is the published numbers from the S.F.G.G.V. was a total of approximately 2900 or so. The published result turns out to be an even 5% of the Greater Vernon area population. As for the published percentages, just because some property owners didn't vote doesn't mean they didn't pay the taxes.
If anyone would like a copy of the above letter. Please email the assoc. at 'bxslca@hotmail.com'.
Secondly, the G.M.O. issue is generating a lot of discussion. Recently, the British Columbia Fruit Growers' Assoc. has "asked the federal government for an immediate moratorium on the genetically modified apple, known under the trademark Arctic apple." ( http://www.vernonmorningstar.com/news/232053381.html ) Also, in the article the President of the B.C.F.G.A. comments "“If 76 per cent of people say the Canadian government has not provided adequate information to the public on GM foods, how can the government then approve these products for introduction to an unprepared marketplace?” said Dukhia. Also the (2012 national) survey carried out by the B.C.F.G.A. and the Quebec Apple Producers Association resulted in "69 per cent of Canadians are not in favour of GM food and 91 per cent said GM labelling should be mandatory."
Please leave your comments/thoughts below in the comment section. As we generally accept and leave all comments (except those that may be inappropriate due to profanity or liability.)
Of course, the second issue could be paraphrased in thirty words or less by the old addage "You are what you eat."
Until next time,
This post has just a couple of entries that are as follows:
Firstly, the assoc. has written and submitted a letter to the Morning Star paper. Specifically, the editorial letter column. As we are anxiously anticipating it's publication, here it is on the 'down low'.
-----------------------
Re: Unification
Recently, a lot of media focus has been on a petition to amalgamate the District of Coldstream, Regional District Areas "B" & "C" with the City of Vernon, or to create a new municipality, under the guise of streamlining regulations when dealing with more than one of the above jurisdictions. The Society for the Future Governance of Greater Vernon is the body that is forwarding the results of this petition to local and provincial authorities for their consideration to undertake a study to examine these possibilities.
While the dream may be entertaining, in reality, it would be a nightmare. For the most part, people live in different jurisdictions by choice. People who feel more comfortable by what a city may afford them live in the city. Likewise, people who prefer a rural lifestyle live in the country. There is no recognizable gain for residents of Electoral Areas to amalgamate with the City of Vernon or any newly formed facsimile. Taxes would certainly increase and services provided would probably not change very much, if any. There is far too much history about both small and large annexations, by the City of Vernon, in the recent past to come to any other conclusion. Also, if there are policies within these four jurisdictions that are truly hampering investment in this area, they can probably be streamlined, without the need to re-invent the municipal wheel.
Mr. Peter Moore stated in one article in the Morning Star, "It would be wise for them to ask to have the question on the ballot so they can vote no once and for all." Well, I would like to point out that the residents of the Regional District Areas have said no before, regarding annexation, when it was put to a referendum back in 2008. As published in the Morning Star article that year "Area B (BX/Swan Lake) reported 76% of respondents were opposed to a change in governance while 24% were in favor. Area C (BX/Silver Star) the question resulted in 74% being against any change while 26% were if favor. For Area D (rural Lumby) 85% wanted to keep the current system while 15% want a change. Area E (Cherryville) residents were the loudest in their support for status quo - 95% - while only 5% wanted change." I understand that Areas D and E are not being sought in this unification petition question. However, the percentages reported are worth mentioning while on the governance topic.
The petition is estimating approximately 4000 signatures to be considered a success. The City of Vernon has a population of 38,150, while its metropolitan region, Greater Vernon, has a population of 58,584 as cited from the Canada 2011 Census. So if the 4000 residents come from all areas as claimed, then it is only 6.8% of the population desiring this change in governance. Hardly a majority and less than 1 in 10. As reported on Monday, November 4th 2013 by "107.5 KISS FM" radio station "they had 1,637 online supporters, with an estimated 1000 written at last count." This actually comes to only 4.6% of the Greater Vernon population.
In conclusion, Re: Unification. All residents should exercise a measured, pragmatic approach rather than an emotionally reactive response. And if the Society for the Future Governance of Greater Vernon desires for more direct input, then possibly they should consider a run for Mayor and/or Council of the respective jurisdictions.
Chris Edwards
President, B.X./Swan Lake Community Association
-----------------------
One detail that isn't in the letter is the published numbers from the S.F.G.G.V. was a total of approximately 2900 or so. The published result turns out to be an even 5% of the Greater Vernon area population. As for the published percentages, just because some property owners didn't vote doesn't mean they didn't pay the taxes.
If anyone would like a copy of the above letter. Please email the assoc. at 'bxslca@hotmail.com'.
Secondly, the G.M.O. issue is generating a lot of discussion. Recently, the British Columbia Fruit Growers' Assoc. has "asked the federal government for an immediate moratorium on the genetically modified apple, known under the trademark Arctic apple." ( http://www.vernonmorningstar.com/news/232053381.html ) Also, in the article the President of the B.C.F.G.A. comments "“If 76 per cent of people say the Canadian government has not provided adequate information to the public on GM foods, how can the government then approve these products for introduction to an unprepared marketplace?” said Dukhia. Also the (2012 national) survey carried out by the B.C.F.G.A. and the Quebec Apple Producers Association resulted in "69 per cent of Canadians are not in favour of GM food and 91 per cent said GM labelling should be mandatory."
Please leave your comments/thoughts below in the comment section. As we generally accept and leave all comments (except those that may be inappropriate due to profanity or liability.)
Of course, the second issue could be paraphrased in thirty words or less by the old addage "You are what you eat."
Until next time,
Saturday, November 9, 2013
November Update
Greetings Bloggers,
This will be short and sweet. Update on the gravel pit petition. The petition drive now has approximately 1000 signatures and there is an online petition available for anyone that is interested. It is at the link below:
http://www.change.org/en-AU/petitions/agriculture-land-commission-of-bc-turn-down-the-request-to-allow-nonfarm-use-a-gravel-pit-on-the-agricultural-land-known-as-5801-brentwood-rd-in-the-bx-ravine-vernon-bc
There are 30 signatures out of 70 needed. I am not sure how the total number of 70 was arrived at, but if your interested please fill out the required information. One signer, the farthest away is out of Lakeland, Florida. Others cite Calgary and others cite Langley as their locale.
There is more information or developments ongoing and we will post the information when available.
Speaking of the A.L.C., the "Globe and Mail" article http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/british-columbia/sacrosanct-agricultural-land-commission-eyed-for-breakup/article15306864/?cmpid=rss1 is quite concerning. As the points below were reported to be from "confidential government documents"
The proposed changes, if approved, will:
1) Dismantle the Agricultural Land Commission – staff and their functions will move into the Ministry of Agriculture. There will be regional panels but decisions will be able to be appealed to a third party and overturned.
2) Change the mandate of the ALC – the ALC will be required to give equal weight to economic development as well as agriculture.
3) Create two classes of ALR – one area will be status quo – this will be the Okanagan and Fraser Valley-Vancouver Island. The other area will cover the Interior, Kootenays and everything north of the Okanagan, where the rules will be “anything goes.”
4) Change what local governments can and can’t do around land use decisions.
5) Make oil and gas decisions the priority land use decisions and the Oil and Gas Commission the primary authority.
Please share your comments below or with your provincial representative (M.L.A.) as this doesn't really help the agriculture culture in British Columbia.
Thanks for your interest, until next time.
This will be short and sweet. Update on the gravel pit petition. The petition drive now has approximately 1000 signatures and there is an online petition available for anyone that is interested. It is at the link below:
http://www.change.org/en-AU/petitions/agriculture-land-commission-of-bc-turn-down-the-request-to-allow-nonfarm-use-a-gravel-pit-on-the-agricultural-land-known-as-5801-brentwood-rd-in-the-bx-ravine-vernon-bc
There are 30 signatures out of 70 needed. I am not sure how the total number of 70 was arrived at, but if your interested please fill out the required information. One signer, the farthest away is out of Lakeland, Florida. Others cite Calgary and others cite Langley as their locale.
There is more information or developments ongoing and we will post the information when available.
Speaking of the A.L.C., the "Globe and Mail" article http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/british-columbia/sacrosanct-agricultural-land-commission-eyed-for-breakup/article15306864/?cmpid=rss1 is quite concerning. As the points below were reported to be from "confidential government documents"
- Create two A.L.R. areas with different rules.
- Change the A.L.C.’s legislative mandate, in one or both ALR areas
- Remove some decisions from the A.L.C.
- Community growth applications decided by local governments.
- Modernize A.L.C. operations by moving the A.L.C. into the Ministry.
The proposed changes, if approved, will:
1) Dismantle the Agricultural Land Commission – staff and their functions will move into the Ministry of Agriculture. There will be regional panels but decisions will be able to be appealed to a third party and overturned.
2) Change the mandate of the ALC – the ALC will be required to give equal weight to economic development as well as agriculture.
3) Create two classes of ALR – one area will be status quo – this will be the Okanagan and Fraser Valley-Vancouver Island. The other area will cover the Interior, Kootenays and everything north of the Okanagan, where the rules will be “anything goes.”
4) Change what local governments can and can’t do around land use decisions.
5) Make oil and gas decisions the priority land use decisions and the Oil and Gas Commission the primary authority.
Please share your comments below or with your provincial representative (M.L.A.) as this doesn't really help the agriculture culture in British Columbia.
Thanks for your interest, until next time.
Thursday, October 17, 2013
Stop B.X. Creek Gravel Pit
Hello Bloggers,
It has come to our attention that a property owner is starting up a gravel pit. Nearby residents / property owners have started a petition and informational campaign to let everyone know what this means to them and the nearby creek. As per their handout (see below.)
_________________________
A property located at the end of Brentwood Road, off East Vernon Road, and bordered by B.X. Creek on the west, the Grey Canal Trail on the east, and B.X. Falls Trail on the North may become a GRAVEL PIT! The BX Falls Trail is listed by Vernon Tourism as the number one trail in the N. Okanagan and the 19.1 acre property is zoned Country Residential and is in the Agricultural Land Reserve.
The property owner has applied for Non-Farm Use to the Agricultural Land Commission (A.L.C.) in order to develop a gravel pit. Because of complaints about use of the land in the past year (operating a pit without a permit) the A.L.C. hasn't made a decision yet. This gives area residents an opportunity to voice their concerns. A petition campaign has begun and letters from concerned citizens and groups affected are being collected.
North Okanagan Regional District (N.O.R.D.) recently passed motions to disallow the extraction of sand/gravel from Country Residential properties in Electoral Areas "B" and "C" (there are 476 properties within a 1 Km radius of this proposed gravel pit.) Regional Director for Area "C", Mr. Mike Macnabb and the Mayor of Vernon, Rob Sawatzky are lobbying the Minister of Energy and Mines to squash any application for mineral extraction on the B.X. Creek ravine.
We are supported by N.O.R.D., the Naturalist Club and have spoken to the Sierra Club, Friends of BX Creek Society, Ribbons of Green, Vernon Tourism, Foothills Community Association, Allan Brookes Nature Center, B.X. Elementary School, School District 22 and others.
Beyond the incompatibility of a gravel pit within proximity to B.X. Elementary School are concerns with the narrow country roads and lack of sidewalks, the constant dust and noise that a commercial operation generates, the danger of wildlife in the treed ravine and the disruption of the wildlife corridor. Bears, bobcats, deer, owls and many other birds find habitat in the B.X. Ravine. Orchards, a Bed and Breakfast, a therapeutic riding center, hay and timothy fields, cattle/horse farms and gardens surround the property.
If the A.L.C. says No to allowing Non-Farm use, the permit goes no further. It dies. Please help us demonstrate THAT A GRAVEL PIT HAS NO PLACE IN AN AREA AS UNIQUE AS THE B.X. RAVINE.
How can you help?
It has come to our attention that a property owner is starting up a gravel pit. Nearby residents / property owners have started a petition and informational campaign to let everyone know what this means to them and the nearby creek. As per their handout (see below.)
_________________________
A property located at the end of Brentwood Road, off East Vernon Road, and bordered by B.X. Creek on the west, the Grey Canal Trail on the east, and B.X. Falls Trail on the North may become a GRAVEL PIT! The BX Falls Trail is listed by Vernon Tourism as the number one trail in the N. Okanagan and the 19.1 acre property is zoned Country Residential and is in the Agricultural Land Reserve.
The property owner has applied for Non-Farm Use to the Agricultural Land Commission (A.L.C.) in order to develop a gravel pit. Because of complaints about use of the land in the past year (operating a pit without a permit) the A.L.C. hasn't made a decision yet. This gives area residents an opportunity to voice their concerns. A petition campaign has begun and letters from concerned citizens and groups affected are being collected.
North Okanagan Regional District (N.O.R.D.) recently passed motions to disallow the extraction of sand/gravel from Country Residential properties in Electoral Areas "B" and "C" (there are 476 properties within a 1 Km radius of this proposed gravel pit.) Regional Director for Area "C", Mr. Mike Macnabb and the Mayor of Vernon, Rob Sawatzky are lobbying the Minister of Energy and Mines to squash any application for mineral extraction on the B.X. Creek ravine.
We are supported by N.O.R.D., the Naturalist Club and have spoken to the Sierra Club, Friends of BX Creek Society, Ribbons of Green, Vernon Tourism, Foothills Community Association, Allan Brookes Nature Center, B.X. Elementary School, School District 22 and others.
Beyond the incompatibility of a gravel pit within proximity to B.X. Elementary School are concerns with the narrow country roads and lack of sidewalks, the constant dust and noise that a commercial operation generates, the danger of wildlife in the treed ravine and the disruption of the wildlife corridor. Bears, bobcats, deer, owls and many other birds find habitat in the B.X. Ravine. Orchards, a Bed and Breakfast, a therapeutic riding center, hay and timothy fields, cattle/horse farms and gardens surround the property.
If the A.L.C. says No to allowing Non-Farm use, the permit goes no further. It dies. Please help us demonstrate THAT A GRAVEL PIT HAS NO PLACE IN AN AREA AS UNIQUE AS THE B.X. RAVINE.
How can you help?
- Sign the petition and/or ask for a petition to be emailed to you and then canvas your neighbourhood, church or groups you belong to.
- Write a letter of concern to the Morning Star Paper.
- Check out: http://www2.worksafebc.com/i/construction/Toolbox/pdfs/TG07-42_dangers_silica_dust.pdf for dangers of crystalline silica produced in the gravel industry.
- http:/www.tourismvernon.com/index.php/activities/hiking for Trail information.
- Email your concerns to stopbscreekpit@outlook.com . Your comments will be passed onto the A.L.C. when we present our brief.
- For pick-up of petitions or letters, call Sue at (250) 545-5624, Elaine at (250) 545-3536, Louise at (250) 542-7687, Peggy at (250) 542-1661 or drop them off at any residence on Brentwood Rd.
We need to act quickly. PLEASE HELP.
____________________________________________________
Here is the youtube link that the residents made
Additionally, we would like to add http://www2.worksafebc.com/i/posters/pdfs/2009/ws_09_04.pdf with regards to Silica Dust.
In conclusion, the residents diligent work shows the threat that this part of the B.X. Creek (and ravine) is facing. Any and all support in this endeavour will be greatly appreciated.
Lastly, I am reminded of what Thomas Jefferson wrote to Benjamin Rush in April 21, 1803.
"It
behoves every man who values liberty of conscience for himself, to
resist invasions of it in the case of others; or their case may, by
change of circumstances, become his own."
Until next time, keep bloggin'!!
Tuesday, October 1, 2013
October's Entry
Hello all,
Sorry for the delay, our August meeting was cancelled. The September meeting was quite informing. Discussion orientated around the "Society for the Future Governance of Greater Vernon" petition. The Association's members and directors were skeptical that this would be beneficial at all to any of the parties proposed. Some members felt that it was a non-starter topic. Others, felt that this initiative should be met with empirical and historical information. This will require more blog postings as the information is quite involving and lengthy. For interested individuals, the Amalgamation of the 'former' Electoral Area "A" (a.k.a. the Okanagan Landing, down by the Vernon airport) is a prime example. Other local examples, are the "Middleton Mountain" area, which was rezoned by the City of Vernon for "light industrial" and now sits nothing but subdivisions. Ironically, new buyers of the aforementioned houses complained about the businesses in the 'light industrial' area despite their predating the homes' construction.
The "Society for the Future Governance of Greater Vernon" last article in the Morning Star was quite surprising, shocking and in our opinion quite contradictory. Previously, the impression was for the Amalgamation of all Greater Vernon areas. However, in the most recent article Mr. Peter Moore (Society Director) said there was a major misconception regarding the Society's aims. It isn't for just the amalgamation of Greater Vernon Areas but "We are looking for a new municipality and not just an absorption by Vernon of the other jurisdictions." ( http://www.vernonmorningstar.com/news/225575722.html )
Wow.
So the obvious question that leaps to mind is. What total costs are entailed in creating a completely new jurisdiction, involving all Electoral areas, District of Coldstream and the City of Vernon??! Pardoning the old cliche this sounds like 'throwing out the baby with the bath water.'
Additional questions include, to remove all existing agreements and personnel would require elections for the new positions, changing of stationary/logos, negotiation for taxation, as well as the 100% funding for road maintainence (which would be alot more in fiscal costs vs the status quo.) Unless, somehow the quote above means something else? Also, could rural property owners (of 3 acres or more) be taxed at City of Vernon levels (on per square foot basis ??) Would the new entity honor the agreement for "Agricultural Rates" for water as well?
For brevity sake, the plethora of additional questions will be added later. But before the question is put to a referendum, perhaps these questions and others should have pragmatic answers first and not be based on emotional rhetoric. Of course, we appreciate all comments on this matter so please feel free to write and leave them in the comments section below.
Of course, this blog entry accompanies the wishes for everyone to have a enjoyable Thanksgiving. Local produce that is season is quite enjoyable and flavorful for meals. Additionally, best wishes for a entertaining, scary but safe Halloween.
More to come (on the concerns and history) on the Amalgamation/New Municipality creation.
Stay tuned for more to come...
Sorry for the delay, our August meeting was cancelled. The September meeting was quite informing. Discussion orientated around the "Society for the Future Governance of Greater Vernon" petition. The Association's members and directors were skeptical that this would be beneficial at all to any of the parties proposed. Some members felt that it was a non-starter topic. Others, felt that this initiative should be met with empirical and historical information. This will require more blog postings as the information is quite involving and lengthy. For interested individuals, the Amalgamation of the 'former' Electoral Area "A" (a.k.a. the Okanagan Landing, down by the Vernon airport) is a prime example. Other local examples, are the "Middleton Mountain" area, which was rezoned by the City of Vernon for "light industrial" and now sits nothing but subdivisions. Ironically, new buyers of the aforementioned houses complained about the businesses in the 'light industrial' area despite their predating the homes' construction.
The "Society for the Future Governance of Greater Vernon" last article in the Morning Star was quite surprising, shocking and in our opinion quite contradictory. Previously, the impression was for the Amalgamation of all Greater Vernon areas. However, in the most recent article Mr. Peter Moore (Society Director) said there was a major misconception regarding the Society's aims. It isn't for just the amalgamation of Greater Vernon Areas but "We are looking for a new municipality and not just an absorption by Vernon of the other jurisdictions." ( http://www.vernonmorningstar.com/news/225575722.html )
Wow.
So the obvious question that leaps to mind is. What total costs are entailed in creating a completely new jurisdiction, involving all Electoral areas, District of Coldstream and the City of Vernon??! Pardoning the old cliche this sounds like 'throwing out the baby with the bath water.'
Additional questions include, to remove all existing agreements and personnel would require elections for the new positions, changing of stationary/logos, negotiation for taxation, as well as the 100% funding for road maintainence (which would be alot more in fiscal costs vs the status quo.) Unless, somehow the quote above means something else? Also, could rural property owners (of 3 acres or more) be taxed at City of Vernon levels (on per square foot basis ??) Would the new entity honor the agreement for "Agricultural Rates" for water as well?
For brevity sake, the plethora of additional questions will be added later. But before the question is put to a referendum, perhaps these questions and others should have pragmatic answers first and not be based on emotional rhetoric. Of course, we appreciate all comments on this matter so please feel free to write and leave them in the comments section below.
Of course, this blog entry accompanies the wishes for everyone to have a enjoyable Thanksgiving. Local produce that is season is quite enjoyable and flavorful for meals. Additionally, best wishes for a entertaining, scary but safe Halloween.
More to come (on the concerns and history) on the Amalgamation/New Municipality creation.
Stay tuned for more to come...
Thursday, July 25, 2013
July/Hot Summer Entry
Greetings again Bloggers,
Welcome to the usual summer weather, we suggest trying to stay cool. A reminder that this weather can be dangerous for pets, etcetera. Enjoy the valley summer activites (to numerous to mention,) safely.
The mural that is for the "Sunflower Project" here in Vernon has been completed for some time. I believe it was done by mid June. The other murals are to be done at the locations of the other 21 internment sites across Canada. Vernon was the first, and it can be seen beside the A&W in the fruit union plaza, on the 'backside' of the "Sutton" building. For more information please refer to this link http://michelleloughery.org/tag/sunflower-project/ and http://www.internmentcanada.ca/ as well.
Some discussion has arisen regarding some activity up Hartnell Rd area. Some may have seen the article in the morning star http://www.vernonmorningstar.com/news/215151731.html . There will be varying opinions on this subject matter. However, the access to the upper residential areas have only one road. So, if any careless behavior actually led to a forest fire per se that could easily damage property and/or threaten people's well being. If we all act responsibly and in a civil manner then these issues resolve themselves. We anticipate more discussion on this subject. Your comments or thoughts are apreciated in the comment section below. Or email the assoc. at the address in previous blogs.
That's all for now, stay tuned for more to come....
Welcome to the usual summer weather, we suggest trying to stay cool. A reminder that this weather can be dangerous for pets, etcetera. Enjoy the valley summer activites (to numerous to mention,) safely.
The mural that is for the "Sunflower Project" here in Vernon has been completed for some time. I believe it was done by mid June. The other murals are to be done at the locations of the other 21 internment sites across Canada. Vernon was the first, and it can be seen beside the A&W in the fruit union plaza, on the 'backside' of the "Sutton" building. For more information please refer to this link http://michelleloughery.org/tag/sunflower-project/ and http://www.internmentcanada.ca/ as well.
Some discussion has arisen regarding some activity up Hartnell Rd area. Some may have seen the article in the morning star http://www.vernonmorningstar.com/news/215151731.html . There will be varying opinions on this subject matter. However, the access to the upper residential areas have only one road. So, if any careless behavior actually led to a forest fire per se that could easily damage property and/or threaten people's well being. If we all act responsibly and in a civil manner then these issues resolve themselves. We anticipate more discussion on this subject. Your comments or thoughts are apreciated in the comment section below. Or email the assoc. at the address in previous blogs.
That's all for now, stay tuned for more to come....
Monday, June 24, 2013
End of June
Greetings Bloggers,
Sorry for the delay in posts, the directors have found the Spring Garden work to be quite time consuming. The the liquid sunshine has been beneficial but also has it's downsides.
OCP Survey #2 for the Area B & C is out and we had a week's timeframe. Unfortunely, this has to be in by Friday, June 28th. Here is the pdf document for download, completion and remittance (to RDNO.) http://www.rdno.ca/docs/BandC_OCP_Review_Survey_2.pdf
Bloggers that reside in Electoral Areas "B" or "C" that have concerns could contact the assoc. at the email address bxslca@hotmail.com or post them in the comment section below.
Happy Canada Day to everyone, please take some time to review the Charter of Rights as they are there for all Canadians. Here's the link to view/download the offical publication. http://publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection/CH37-4-3-2002E.pdf
The president feels strongly on the GMO issue. Recently, he read an article that had someone who had worked in the Summerland Research Facility. Instead of posting a direct link he suggests internet searching of the title "Former GMO Engineer Drops Biotech and Goes Organic", it is published online by "Organic Connections". A worthwhile read in his opinion. If bloggers want the link then post that in the comments and we shall facilitate that link sharing, or if readers' want to post the link in the comments that would be okay also.
That's all for now, we shall post more in the near future.
Sorry for the delay in posts, the directors have found the Spring Garden work to be quite time consuming. The the liquid sunshine has been beneficial but also has it's downsides.
OCP Survey #2 for the Area B & C is out and we had a week's timeframe. Unfortunely, this has to be in by Friday, June 28th. Here is the pdf document for download, completion and remittance (to RDNO.) http://www.rdno.ca/docs/BandC_OCP_Review_Survey_2.pdf
Bloggers that reside in Electoral Areas "B" or "C" that have concerns could contact the assoc. at the email address bxslca@hotmail.com or post them in the comment section below.
Happy Canada Day to everyone, please take some time to review the Charter of Rights as they are there for all Canadians. Here's the link to view/download the offical publication. http://publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection/CH37-4-3-2002E.pdf
The president feels strongly on the GMO issue. Recently, he read an article that had someone who had worked in the Summerland Research Facility. Instead of posting a direct link he suggests internet searching of the title "Former GMO Engineer Drops Biotech and Goes Organic", it is published online by "Organic Connections". A worthwhile read in his opinion. If bloggers want the link then post that in the comments and we shall facilitate that link sharing, or if readers' want to post the link in the comments that would be okay also.
That's all for now, we shall post more in the near future.
Wednesday, May 1, 2013
May 1st, 2013 Latest Blog
Hello Bloggers,
Short entry with the highlight of last meeting (in Apr. 2013.) The meeting had a presenter Re: Internment Historical sites in B.C. (and across Canada.) Named the "Sunflower Project" because the immigrants brought seeds with them to Canada from Europe and other areas. The sites were used during the First World War and the Vernon site was the last to close in 1920.
Link and more specific information can be found and the following website:
http://michelleloughery.org/
Excerpt from the website: "Beginning in Vernon, one of the 24 internment camp locations, Loughery and her team will provide educational workshops in each community. These events, focused on information and story collection, will engage all generations and affected groups within the community. The goal of each workshop will be to share the cultural history of the people featured in the mural, and to create opportunities for social healing and the promotion of human rights."
This led to lengthy discussion, but if anyone wants to comment or share thoughts on support, please leave comments below, email the assoc at 'bxslca@hotmail.com' , or contact the artist directly through the address above.
Also there is a news release mentioning the "Sunflower Project" at the following address: http://www.internmentcanada.ca/PDF/media/Sunflower%20Project%20Media%20Release%20-%20Feb%2020,%202013.pdf
The O.C.P. imput process ended for Areas B & C on Apr. 22nd, 2013. This doesn't mean the process is over and by the fall (in or around there) there will be a request for the public to review the plan. It was described as 'Did we get it right?' as the presenter phrased it at the A.G.M.
Well that's all for now, stay tuned as more information will be posted as we get it and please leave your thoughts in the comment section below.
Short entry with the highlight of last meeting (in Apr. 2013.) The meeting had a presenter Re: Internment Historical sites in B.C. (and across Canada.) Named the "Sunflower Project" because the immigrants brought seeds with them to Canada from Europe and other areas. The sites were used during the First World War and the Vernon site was the last to close in 1920.
Link and more specific information can be found and the following website:
http://michelleloughery.org/
Excerpt from the website: "Beginning in Vernon, one of the 24 internment camp locations, Loughery and her team will provide educational workshops in each community. These events, focused on information and story collection, will engage all generations and affected groups within the community. The goal of each workshop will be to share the cultural history of the people featured in the mural, and to create opportunities for social healing and the promotion of human rights."
This led to lengthy discussion, but if anyone wants to comment or share thoughts on support, please leave comments below, email the assoc at 'bxslca@hotmail.com' , or contact the artist directly through the address above.
Also there is a news release mentioning the "Sunflower Project" at the following address: http://www.internmentcanada.ca/PDF/media/Sunflower%20Project%20Media%20Release%20-%20Feb%2020,%202013.pdf
The O.C.P. imput process ended for Areas B & C on Apr. 22nd, 2013. This doesn't mean the process is over and by the fall (in or around there) there will be a request for the public to review the plan. It was described as 'Did we get it right?' as the presenter phrased it at the A.G.M.
Well that's all for now, stay tuned as more information will be posted as we get it and please leave your thoughts in the comment section below.
Wednesday, April 10, 2013
April's Blog / Post AGM
Hello Bloggers,
The AGM held at the Best Western Vernon Lodge was a success. The turnout was a little less than expected however, all participants were cordial, informative and interested. Some questions were outside of the proposed agenda however, this didn't detract from the overall timeline provided.
Laura Frank's presentation Re: O.C.P. for the R.D.N.O. was quite informative. I shall refer you to the links below for more information.
We are always welcoming new members and/or directors. It doesn't take as much time as one might think and the information is very worthwhile. Please email the assoc. if your are interested.
Lastly, due to the President's short memory, the ammended "President's Report" is below, if you would like a copy emailed to you, please let us know through an email to bxslca@hotmail.com .
Stay tuned until next time.
____________________________________
Greetings, It is hard to believe how fast a year goes by. But here is a number of items the association was involved with in the past year. It should be noted here that these are not in chronological order but rather, the order that generated discussion.
There was the letter that was sent to Mr. Letnick (Re: Meat Regulations) to request that the issuance of Class "D" & "E" licenses, specifically here in the Okanagan valley, occur as soon as possible. The article in the "Morning Star" about Mr. Letnick's announcement was diappointing. In my opinion, five licenses is rather limiting and finite for the geographical area considered. However, more people sending their comments may help make this an issue in the upcoming election.
Related to that indirectly, is the Provincial Government's changes to the "Agricultural Waste Regulations". The provincial documents with the information (which is considerable reading) are in the publications that are entitled "BC Environmental Farm Plan Reference Guide" & (for use with the) "Canada - BC Environmental Farm Plan: Planning Workbook". Some opinions regarding this subject are that they are expensive, onerous and ill conceived with regards to requirements. Basically it seems like a more reactionary response rather than having a symbiotic approach.
Also, there was alot of previous references to the "BX Ranch Park" being called or titled "BX Dog Park" in 2012. Some directors showed and interest and wrote a questionaire which had numerous responses from the park's users. The secondary sign that contravened local by-laws (regarding "Parks") was removed by the R.D.N.O. (not in connection with our disagreement with it.) Some things learned from the first (weekday) questionaire include:
Lastly, there was the issue of the road washout in the previous spring. The two sites were known to be problematic during years of flooding. New repairs took longer than previous in history (within the last two decades,) didn't involve the use of temporary bridges, but seem to be more robust and/or secure. These repairs have future consideration of flooding that occur within five-fifteen years or so. Currently the corner (near BX Elementary School) is complete.
Thank you for your time,
Chris Edwards, President
____________________________________
The AGM held at the Best Western Vernon Lodge was a success. The turnout was a little less than expected however, all participants were cordial, informative and interested. Some questions were outside of the proposed agenda however, this didn't detract from the overall timeline provided.
Laura Frank's presentation Re: O.C.P. for the R.D.N.O. was quite informative. I shall refer you to the links below for more information.
- Overview of the Official Community Plan Review Process = http://www.rdno.ca/index.php/services/planning-building/planning-projects/official-community-plan-for-electoral-areas-b-c-review
- Survey for completetion by area residents = http://www.rdno.ca/docs/area-b-c-ocp-survey.pdf
- Area Map (this pertains to areas within the purple borders) = http://www.rdno.ca/docs/electoral_area_b_c_plan_boundary_map.pdf
We are always welcoming new members and/or directors. It doesn't take as much time as one might think and the information is very worthwhile. Please email the assoc. if your are interested.
Lastly, due to the President's short memory, the ammended "President's Report" is below, if you would like a copy emailed to you, please let us know through an email to bxslca@hotmail.com .
Stay tuned until next time.
____________________________________
BX/SWAN LAKE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
President's Report
Apr. 2nd, 2013
There was the letter that was sent to Mr. Letnick (Re: Meat Regulations) to request that the issuance of Class "D" & "E" licenses, specifically here in the Okanagan valley, occur as soon as possible. The article in the "Morning Star" about Mr. Letnick's announcement was diappointing. In my opinion, five licenses is rather limiting and finite for the geographical area considered. However, more people sending their comments may help make this an issue in the upcoming election.
Related to that indirectly, is the Provincial Government's changes to the "Agricultural Waste Regulations". The provincial documents with the information (which is considerable reading) are in the publications that are entitled "BC Environmental Farm Plan Reference Guide" & (for use with the) "Canada - BC Environmental Farm Plan: Planning Workbook". Some opinions regarding this subject are that they are expensive, onerous and ill conceived with regards to requirements. Basically it seems like a more reactionary response rather than having a symbiotic approach.
Also, there was alot of previous references to the "BX Ranch Park" being called or titled "BX Dog Park" in 2012. Some directors showed and interest and wrote a questionaire which had numerous responses from the park's users. The secondary sign that contravened local by-laws (regarding "Parks") was removed by the R.D.N.O. (not in connection with our disagreement with it.) Some things learned from the first (weekday) questionaire include:
- 52% of all park users name the creek as their favorite feature of the park,
- 68% of park users would like a light installed in the parking lot,
- 63% would like a garbage container placed farther in the park,
- These above items being possibly supported through municipal taxation was supported by 78% of park users. Total number in these two days was one hundred and sixty-eight respondents.
Lastly, there was the issue of the road washout in the previous spring. The two sites were known to be problematic during years of flooding. New repairs took longer than previous in history (within the last two decades,) didn't involve the use of temporary bridges, but seem to be more robust and/or secure. These repairs have future consideration of flooding that occur within five-fifteen years or so. Currently the corner (near BX Elementary School) is complete.
Thank you for your time,
Chris Edwards, President
____________________________________
Monday, March 11, 2013
Spring Like Weather
Good Day Bloggers,
This is quick blog on a couple of different subjects (OCP & Agriculture.) As for OCP details, we are still going to post them but the spring time weather has kept many of the directors busy. Also, preparation for the upcoming AGM (Apr. 2nd, 2013 @ The Best Western Plus Vernon Lodge, from 7 pm - 9 pm,) is taking considerable time as well. Since one of the featured speakers at the meeting mentioned above will be addressing the OCP as a featured topic, we will have details after that. Or anyone interested can come (don't forget the $5.00 membership per person,) and hear it from the speaker herself.
As for the springtime weather, one director saw this short segment and would like to share.
http://growtest.org/2013/03/07/ron-finley-a-guerilla-gardener-in-south-central-la/
There are article links on the left side of the screen and in the middle (just below the banner, which is a link to "YouTube" and the "TED Talks" speech that Mr. Finley did. It is titled "Ron Finley: A guerilla gardener in South Central LA" At the end he does mention a not so "politically correct" word. Acronym for fecal matter is your only clue.
Others could be considered to be congruent with the speaker in the video with more of a closer locale, http://www.kelownadailycourier.ca/front-page-news/urban-farmer-the-focus-of-new-documentary-film-31113.html .
And for something cute and entirely unrelated...
(A quick vid out of the UK...) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ekr05T9Iaio for some light humor.
Stay tuned for more...
This is quick blog on a couple of different subjects (OCP & Agriculture.) As for OCP details, we are still going to post them but the spring time weather has kept many of the directors busy. Also, preparation for the upcoming AGM (Apr. 2nd, 2013 @ The Best Western Plus Vernon Lodge, from 7 pm - 9 pm,) is taking considerable time as well. Since one of the featured speakers at the meeting mentioned above will be addressing the OCP as a featured topic, we will have details after that. Or anyone interested can come (don't forget the $5.00 membership per person,) and hear it from the speaker herself.
As for the springtime weather, one director saw this short segment and would like to share.
http://growtest.org/2013/03/07/ron-finley-a-guerilla-gardener-in-south-central-la/
There are article links on the left side of the screen and in the middle (just below the banner, which is a link to "YouTube" and the "TED Talks" speech that Mr. Finley did. It is titled "Ron Finley: A guerilla gardener in South Central LA" At the end he does mention a not so "politically correct" word. Acronym for fecal matter is your only clue.
Others could be considered to be congruent with the speaker in the video with more of a closer locale, http://www.kelownadailycourier.ca/front-page-news/urban-farmer-the-focus-of-new-documentary-film-31113.html .
And for something cute and entirely unrelated...
(A quick vid out of the UK...) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ekr05T9Iaio for some light humor.
Stay tuned for more...
Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Last Mention in Feb.
Hello Bloggers,
This blog will cover various subjects in general. Further details will be posted once finalized; in no particular order:
The association is consistently looking for new members and/or interested individuals as directors. This isn't as formidable as it sounds, but is certainly quite educational. Contact the association at the email address bxslca@hotmail.com .
Some directors attended the Schubert Center with Mr. Norm Letnick's annoucement concerning the "Class E licenses issuance" within the Northern Okanagan.
http://www.vernonmorningstar.com/news/192611441.html
There are numerous questions still that remain unanswered despite this announcement. Dissapointment in the number of licenses announced and content was common to all informal discussion. A lot of the comments were similar to the ones expressed in the above article.
There will be more posts as time goes by as there will be more details added about the AGM.
As always, comments are welcome below.
This blog will cover various subjects in general. Further details will be posted once finalized; in no particular order:
- Our Annual General Meeting on Apr. 2nd, 2013 will be at the "Best Western Vernon Lodge" (3914 - 32nd Street, Vernon, BC, V1T 5P1, Canada.) From 7pm - 9 pm.
- Speakers tentatively scheduled include one from the R.D.N.O. Re: "Regional Growth Strategy" and one from the "Bee S.A.F.E." Re: Genetically Modified Organisms.
- Some information on Parks (Regional Areas "B" & "C") and some other subjects that will listed when defined.
- F.Y.I. there is a $5.00 membership fee per person.
The association is consistently looking for new members and/or interested individuals as directors. This isn't as formidable as it sounds, but is certainly quite educational. Contact the association at the email address bxslca@hotmail.com .
Some directors attended the Schubert Center with Mr. Norm Letnick's annoucement concerning the "Class E licenses issuance" within the Northern Okanagan.
http://www.vernonmorningstar.com/news/192611441.html
There are numerous questions still that remain unanswered despite this announcement. Dissapointment in the number of licenses announced and content was common to all informal discussion. A lot of the comments were similar to the ones expressed in the above article.
There will be more posts as time goes by as there will be more details added about the AGM.
As always, comments are welcome below.
Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Happy New Year +
Greetings Bloggers,
The new year has arrived and we will blog about a small number of topics.
First there is the "Official Community Plan". This is a large subject so we will cover the new information. Essentially, the O.C.P. is under review this year and there will be requests for input from the public. We shall cover more in detail on this subject soon. However, there will be notices or articles in the paper (or at least we expect there to be.) The association's AGM will have a speaker on this subject and we will have more of those details soon as well.
Second, the proposed park in the BX area or "Area C". It's a total of 166 acres for approximately 3.2 Million. A change or suggested option would be that the parcel be seperated into 2 parts. The flat part would conceiveably be sold and the 'hilly' area (that is adjacent to the Mutrie Road dog park) be the adopted park. Number of individuals disagreed. The general concenus was that it should remain a one parcel, despite the acquistion cost. Please feel free to leave your thoughts in the comment section.
Third, Winter Carnival has a "prehistoric theme" for this year's festivities. This event is quite large so we are will refer you to the 'magazine handout' (for free) at various local businesses. Activities are listed and numerous and we believe there is something for everybody, so to speak. If you like, please leave comments on your pleasurable experiences at these upcoming events. Of course, the biggest, or longest running event associated with the Winter Carnival is the Parade on mainstreet. Date of parade, Saturday, Febuary 2nd, commencing at 12PM (sharp!)
Fourth, is the Association's Annual General Meeting, April 2nd at the Best Western Vernon Lodge. More details to come, new members are welcome at the economical membership price of only Five dollars. Speakers list isn't finalized yet but there will be one (speaker) addressing the public input for the OCP, which we will mention in more detail after the next directorship meeting. Possibly some other topics will also be blogged about before the upcoming meeting.
This pretty much concludes this first blog of 2013. As always, comments, questions or suggestions are welcome below. Email address for the association is bxslca@hotmail.com if that is more your prerogative.
Until next time...
The new year has arrived and we will blog about a small number of topics.
First there is the "Official Community Plan". This is a large subject so we will cover the new information. Essentially, the O.C.P. is under review this year and there will be requests for input from the public. We shall cover more in detail on this subject soon. However, there will be notices or articles in the paper (or at least we expect there to be.) The association's AGM will have a speaker on this subject and we will have more of those details soon as well.
Second, the proposed park in the BX area or "Area C". It's a total of 166 acres for approximately 3.2 Million. A change or suggested option would be that the parcel be seperated into 2 parts. The flat part would conceiveably be sold and the 'hilly' area (that is adjacent to the Mutrie Road dog park) be the adopted park. Number of individuals disagreed. The general concenus was that it should remain a one parcel, despite the acquistion cost. Please feel free to leave your thoughts in the comment section.
Third, Winter Carnival has a "prehistoric theme" for this year's festivities. This event is quite large so we are will refer you to the 'magazine handout' (for free) at various local businesses. Activities are listed and numerous and we believe there is something for everybody, so to speak. If you like, please leave comments on your pleasurable experiences at these upcoming events. Of course, the biggest, or longest running event associated with the Winter Carnival is the Parade on mainstreet. Date of parade, Saturday, Febuary 2nd, commencing at 12PM (sharp!)
Fourth, is the Association's Annual General Meeting, April 2nd at the Best Western Vernon Lodge. More details to come, new members are welcome at the economical membership price of only Five dollars. Speakers list isn't finalized yet but there will be one (speaker) addressing the public input for the OCP, which we will mention in more detail after the next directorship meeting. Possibly some other topics will also be blogged about before the upcoming meeting.
This pretty much concludes this first blog of 2013. As always, comments, questions or suggestions are welcome below. Email address for the association is bxslca@hotmail.com if that is more your prerogative.
Until next time...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)